Skip to Main Content

CETL Resources: Critiquing Student Projects

Critiquing and Feedback

In this section we examine how to critique student projects and provide feedback that is meaningful and useful to the student. 

Giving Feedback

Feedback is simply an evaluative response. It can come from you as the instructor or through peer evaluations. Feedback can be positive, negative, or neutral (or any combination thereof) and come in a variety of formats including verbal, written, and gestures.  Hattie and Timperley’s (2007) four levels of feedback:

  • Task Level Feedback
    • This level includes how well a task is being accomplished or performed. This is the most common type of feedback and can inform correctness, behaviors, or other criteria assigned to the task. Task Level Feedback is most powerful when not combined with other levels of feedback and is positive rather than negative.
  • Process Level Feedback
    • Process Level Feedback “relates to students’ strategies for error detection” so that they are able to reassess the process and provide their own “self feedback.”
  • Self-Regulation Level Feedback
    • “Self-Regulation involves an interplay between commitment, control and confidence. It addresses the way students monitor, direct, and regulate actions toward a learning goal… and involves self-generated thoughts, feelings, and actions that are adapted to the attainment of personal goals.”
  • Self as a Person Level Feedback
    • This is included not because it’s effective, but because it is typically the most common form of feedback given to students. This type of feedback contains little to no task-related feedback, but instead addresses the student

Examples of Feedback

Feedback

Ineffective

Effective

Task Level Feedback

“You did everything wrong.”

“You did not follow the directions provided and this resulted in the project results being inaccurate. In the future, please read the instructions carefully.”

“You need to include more details about…”

Process Level Feedback

 “More detail”

“You need to discuss whether the findings in this experiment support or reject your hypothesis and why.”

“You need to edit this piece of writing to include…..”

Self-Regulation Level Feedback

“Missing info in intro.”

“You are already familiar with the key components of the argument. Check to see if you have incorporated them into your introduction.”

Self-as-a-Person Level Feedback

“Good Job.” 

“Keep up the good work! You will see better results in the future if you…”

The image below (Brooks, et al, 2019) details prompts and strategies to provide quality feedback to your students.

feedback matrix with prompts on providing positive and effective feedback

When to Give Feedback

The purpose of timely feedback is so the students use it to reach the desired learning goal.  Feedback on a topic or assignment they no longer have to deal with may be seen as useless. Ultimately, feedback is most useful when students can take what you have said and use it to increase the quality of their work.

How Much Feedback?

It’s natural for many educators to want to fix everything they see. When giving quality feedback, consider the Goldilocks idea, not too hard, not too soft, just right. “For real learning, what makes the difference is a usable amount of information that connects with something students already know and takes them from that point to the next level. Judging the right amount of feedback to give – how much, on how many points – requires deep knowledge and the consideration of the following:

  • The topic in general and your learning target or targets in particular
  • Typical developmental learning progressions for those topics or targets
  • Your individual students

Purpose:

  • For students to get enough feedback so that they understand what to do but not so much that the work has been done for them
  • For the students to get feedback on “teachable moment” points but not an overwhelming number

Examples of Good Amounts of Feedback

Examples of Bad Amounts of Feedback

  • Selecting two or three main points about a paper for comment
  • Giving feedback on important learning targets
  • Commenting on at least as many strengths as  weaknesses
  • Returning a student’s paper with every error in  mechanics edited
  • Writing comments on a paper that are more voluminous than the paper itself
  • Writing voluminous comments on poor-quality papers and almost nothing on good-quality papers

(Brookhart, 2008)

For information on giving feedback with technology, check out the Chronicle's guide, How to Give Your Students Better Feedback With Technology.

References

References

Brookhart, S. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. ASCD.

Brooks, C., Carroll, A., Gillies, R. M., & Hattie, J. (2019). A matrix of feedback for learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.2

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://login.proxy103.nclive.org/login